BFEVFL: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
→‎Dictionary entry: Update phrasing to clarify that the index of the next node in the tree is not referring to the bit index.
m (→‎Relocation table: fix code formatting)
m (→‎Dictionary entry: Update phrasing to clarify that the index of the next node in the tree is not referring to the bit index.)
Line 144: Line 144:
| 0x0 || u32 || Compact representation of bit index
| 0x0 || u32 || Compact representation of bit index
|-
|-
| 0x4 || u16 || Next index if bit is 0
| 0x4 || u16 || Index of next node if bit is 0
|-
|-
| 0x6 || u16 || Next index if bit is 1
| 0x6 || u16 || Index of next node if bit is 1
|-
|-
| 0x8 || PascalString* || Name
| 0x8 || PascalString* || Name
autopatrol
55

edits

Navigation menu